TECHNICAL MECHANICS
ISSN (Print): 1561-9184, ISSN (Online): 2616-6380

HOME    ABOUT THIS JOURNAL    EDITORIAL BOARD    GUIDE FOR AUTHORS    CURRENT    JOURNAL ISSUES    CONTACTS

UDC 539.3

Technical mechanics, 2018, 4, 90 - 104

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF MISSILE PAYLOAD OPERATION

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/itm2018.04.090

Martynenko G. Yu., Chernobryvko M. V., Avramov M. V., Martynenko V. G., Tonkonozhenko A. Ì., Kozharin V. Yu.

Martynenko G. Yu.
National Technical University “Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute” Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine
Ukraine

Chernobryvko M. V.
National Technical University “Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute” Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine
A. Pidgorny Institute of Mechanical Engineering Problems
Ukraine

Avramov M. V.
National Technical University “Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute” Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine
A. Pidgorny Institute of Mechanical Engineering Problems
Ukraine

Martynenko V. G.
National Technical University “Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute” Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine
Ukraine

Tonkonozhenko A. Ì.
Yuzhnoye State Design Office
Ukraine

Kozharin V. Yu.
Yuzhnoye State Design Office
Ukraine

      This paper considers the features of numerical simulation of the predicted destruction of the fastening elements of a special rocket structure under a given gas-dynamic impulse load. The structure under consideration is a composite one; its components are fastened with bolts and ties. The stress and strain field and the destruction time of an assembled missile payload are investigated. The problem is solved numerically using the ANSYS universal program system for finite-element analysis. The proposed technique for numerical simulation of fastening element destruction includes three stages and in comparison with the standard one offers a faster computational speed and a better convergence for the essentially nonlinear problem. The proposed three-stage approach to simulating the missile payload operation accounts for all loading factors. At the first stage, the static stress and strain field of the whole structure produced by its assembly (bolt tightening) is investigated. At the second stage, the dynamic stress and strain field of the whole structure under impulse loading is investigated with account for the bilinear law of plastic flow and the sliding speed dependence of the friction factor. The objective of the third stage is to investigate the destruction of the statically loaded fastening elements of the structure under the action of the total pressure of a gas-dynamic impulse load and the action of the payload flying apart. The plastic flow of the material is described using the Cowper?Symonds hardening model. The destruction criterion is the maximum plastic strain. The estimated time is synchronized with the actual structure loading time, which allows one to predict the fastening element destruction point. The use of the proposed technique at the development stage allows one to replace full-scale experiments with numerical studies.

composite structure, fastening element, gas-dynamic impulse load, elastoplastic deformation, Cowper?Symonds hardening model, element destruction

1. Kharchenko V. V. Simulation of High-Speed Material Deformation with Account for Viscoplastic Effects. Kyiv: G. S. Pisarenko Institute for Problems of Strength of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 1999. 280 pp. (in Russian).

2. Ben-Dor G. Dubinsky A., Elperin T. High-Speed Penetration Dynamics: Engineering Models and Methods. World Scientific Publishing, 2013. 311 pp. https://doi.org/10.1142/8651

3. Anderson Ted L. Fracture Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications, Fourth Edition. CRC Press, 2017. 259 pp. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315370293

4. Kukudzhanov V. N. Computer Simulation of the Deformation, Damageability, and Failure of Inelastic Materials and Structures. Moscow: MFTI, 2008. 212 pp. (in Russian).

5. Dursun T., Soutis C. Recent developments in advanced aircraft aluminium alloys. Materials & Design. 2014. V 56. Pp. 862?871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.12.002

6. Cadoni E., Singh N. K., Singha M. K., Gupta N. K. Dynamic tensile behavior of multiphase high yield strength steel. Materials & Design. No. 32 (10). Pp. 5091?5098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.06.027

7. Pisarenko G. S., Lebedev A. A. Material Deformation and Strength in a Complex Stressed State. Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 1976. 416 pp. (in Russian).

8. Hudramovich V. S. Simulation of stressed-strained state of shell structures for rocket technology and power engineering. Teh. Meh. 2013. No. 4. Pp. 97-104. (in Russian).

9. Kursun A., Senel M., Enginsoy H. M. Experimental and numerical analysis of low velocity impact on a preloaded composite. Advances in Engineering Software. 2015. V. 90. Pp. 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.06.010

10. Yang Zh. Finite element simulation of response of buried shelters to blast loadings. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design. 1997. V. 24. Iss. 3. Pp. 113-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-874X(96)00033-9

11. Tada Y., Nishihara Sh. Optimum shape design of contact surface with finite element method. Advances in Engineering Software. 1993. V. 18. Iss. 2. Pp. 75-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/0965-9978(94)90001-9

12. Idesman A., Pham D. Accurate finite element modeling of acoustic waves. Computer Physics Communications. 2014. V. 185. Iss. 7. Pp. 2034-2045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2014.04.009

13. Cowper G., Symonds P. Strain hardening and strain-rate effects in the impact loading of cantilever beams. Tech. Rep. Brown University: Division of Applied Mathematics, 1957. https://doi.org/10.21236/AD0144762

14. Dong An., Tian Y. General formula to calculate the fragment velocity of warheads with hollow core. Int. J. Imp. Eng. 2018. No. 11 (5). Pp. 477-496.

15. Martynenko G., Chernobryvko M., Avramov K., Martynenko V., Tonkonozhenko A., Kozharin V., Klymenko D. Numerical simulation of missile warhead operation. Advances in Engineering Software. 2018. V. 123. Pp. 93-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2018.07.001

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/itm2018.04.090

Copyright (©) 2018 Martynenko G. Yu., Chernobryvko M. V., Avramov M. V., Martynenko V. G., Tonkonozhenko A. Ì., Kozharin V. Yu.

Copyright © 2014-2018 Technical mechanics