TECHNICAL MECHANICS
ISSN (Print): 1561-9184, ISSN (Online): 2616-6380

HOME    ABOUT THIS JOURNAL    EDITORIAL BOARD    GUIDE FOR AUTHORS    CURRENT    JOURNAL ISSUES    CONTACTS

UDC 629.78

Technical mechanics, 2022, 1, 26 - 35

Verification of analytical antiderivatives forms using correlation analysis for mechanical problems

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/itm2022.01.026

Alpatov A. Ð., Kravets V. V., Kravets V. V., Lapkhanov E. A.

Alpatov A. Ð.
Institute of Technical Mechanics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine and the State Space Agency of Ukraine

Kravets V. V.
Dnipro State Agrarian and Economic University

Kravets V. V.
Dnipro State Agrarian and Economic University

Lapkhanov E. A.
Institute of Technical Mechanics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine and the State Space Agency of Ukraine

      An analytical search for antiderivative functions (indefinite integrals) is widely used in the mathematical simulation of various engineering, economic, ecological, biological, social, and other processes. In their turn, mechanical problems have many subproblems whose solution involves analytical integration methods. Among these problems is the problem of development of analytical models for navigation and ballistics support and control theory models in space rocket engineering. The advantage of this approach to mathematical simulation is a fast analysis of the state of dynamic systems on different time intervals without calculating all previous states.
      In their turn, for some classes of functions, antiderivatives may be found in several different ways, as a result of which there exist several different forms of antiderivatives that are hard to verify by the classical method in standard form. This is mainly due to the choice of various combinations of integration methods used in the development of analytical models, in particular in problems of applied mechanics.
      Taking into consideration these difficulties in the verification of the set of antiderivative functions, this paper proposes a method to check their analytical forms for correspondence with the use of correlation analysis. In doing so, the arrays of the values of each antiderivative form at certain nodal points are represented as a set of random variables. With this in mind, it is suggested that the verification process be conducted with the use of the standard approach based on correlation analysis (using Pearson’s correlation coefficient). The efficiency of the method is shown by the example of verifying the antiderivatives of the reciprocal of a squared quadratic trinomial. This approach will make it possible to check the adequacy of the i-th candidate antiderivative and to adapt the problem to the standard form.
     

antiderivative, verification method, correlation analysis, analytical model, mechanics, integration

1. Teschl G. Ordinary Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems. American Mathematical Society (AMS), 2012. 353 pp. URL: https://www.mat.univie.ac.at/~gerald/ftp/book-ode/ode.pdf (Last accessed on February 12, 2022). https://doi.org/10.1090/gsm/140

2. Perko L. Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems. 3rd Ed. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2001. 555 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0003-8

3. Chern I. L. Mathematical Modeling and Ordinary Differential Equations. Department of Mathematics National Taiwan University, 2016. 216 pp. URL: http://www.math.ntu.edu.tw/~chern/notes/ode2015.pdf (Last accessed on February 12, 2022).

4. Tirelli M. Linear Difference Equations. 2014. URL: http://econdse.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/linear_difference_eq-LectureNotes-Tirelli.pdf (Last accessed on February 12, 2022).

5. Neusser K. Difference Equations for Economists, Preliminary and Incomplete. 2021. 199 pp. URL: http://www.neusser.ch/downloads/DifferenceEquations.pdf (Last accessed on February 12, 2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/app12073604

6. Hegde U. S., Uma S., Aravind P. N., Malashri S. Fourier transforms and its applications in engineering field. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology. 2017. V. 6. Iss. 6. Pp. 10294 - 10298.

7. Serov V. Fourier Series, Fourier Transform and their Applications to Mathematical Physics. Springer International Publishing AG 2017, 2017. 534 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65262-7

8. Keisler H. J. Foundations of Infinitesimal Calculus. Madison: Department of Mathematics University of Wisconsin, 2011. 203 pp. URL: https://people.math.wisc.edu/~keisler/foundations.pdf (Last accessed on February 12, 2022).

9. Alpatov A. P. Spacecraft Dynamics. Kyiv: Naukova Dymka, 2016. 488 pp. (in Russian).

10. Cohen H. Complex Analysis with Applications in Science and Engineering. Springer-Verlag US 2007, 2007. 477 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73058-5

11. Magnus R. Fundamental Mathematical Analysis. Springer Undergraduate Mathematics Series, 2020. 433 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46321-2

12. Myshkis A. D. Lectures on Higher Mathematics. 5th Ed. St. Petersburg: Lan, 2007. 688 pp. (in Russian).

13. Sergeeva Yu. R., Tuchin D. A. Algorithm for determining the analytical model parameters of the navigation satellites motion. IPM preprints im. M.V. Keldysh. 2016. No. 109. 16 pp. URL: http://library.keldysh.ru/preprint.asp?id=2016-109 (Last accessed on February 12, 2022). (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.20948/prepr-2016-109

14. Bordovitsyna T. V., Avdyushev V. A. Theory of Earth's Artificial Satellites Motion. Analytical and Numerical methods: Proc. allowance. Tomsk: Tomsk University Publishing House, 2007. 178 pp. (in Russian).

15. Curtis H. Orbital Mechanics for Engineering Students. 4th Ed. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2019. 692 pp.

16. Fortescue P., Stark J., Swinerd G. Spacecraft Systems Engineering. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2011. 724 pp. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119971009

17. Keisler H. J. Elementary Calculus. An Infinitesimal Approach. 2nd Ed. Stanford: Creative Commons, 2000. 982 pp.

18. Kat C.-J., Els P. S. Validation metric based on relative error. Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems. 2012. V. 18. No. 5. Pp. 487-520. https://doi.org/10.1080/13873954.2012.663392

19. Chen C., Twycross J., Garibaldi J. M. A new accuracy measure based on bounded relative error for time series forecasting. PLoS ONE. 2017. V. 12. No. 3. e0174202. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174202

20. Evans M. J., Rosenthal J. S. Probability and Statistics: The Science of Uncertainty. 2nd Ed. W. H. Freeman, 2009. 638 pp.

21. Soong T. T. Fundamentals of Probability and Statistics for Engineers. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2004. 391 pp.

Copyright (©) 2022 Alpatov A. Ð., Kravets V. V., Kravets V. V., Lapkhanov E. A.

Copyright © 2014-2022 Technical mechanics