data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07edd/07edde80f447294e5c3792f54f80356cdacead7e" alt="" |
Home
>
Journal Issues
>
No 2 (2019) Technical mechanics
>
6
___________________________________________________
UDC 532.5
Technical mechanics, 2019, 2, 60 - 72
ANALYSIS OF RELATIONSHIPS FOR THE DETERMINATION OF THE AERODYNAMIC FORCES ACTING ON PARTICLES IN A GAS-DISPERSED FLOW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15407/itm2019.02.060
Knyshenko Yu. V., Shcherbakov V. I.
Knyshenko Yu. V.
Institute of Technical Mechanics
of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine and the State Space Agency of Ukraine
Shcherbakov V. I.
Institute of Technical Mechanics
of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine and the State Space Agency of Ukraine
The aim of this work is to analyze existing analytical and empirical relationships for determining the forces
acting on a solid particle in a gas flow which are caused by its rotation (the Magnus force) and the gradient
of the carrying gas velocity (the Saffman force). These forces act transversely to the velocity of a particle
in a gas flow with restricting walls, and their effect is crucial in terms of the adequacy of calculation
of the particle trajectory parameters. The paper analyzes relationships for Magnus and Saffman force
determination obtained analytically or by mathematical treatment of experimental data and limited
by certain values of criterion parameters. The force determination criteria are the Reynolds numbers
based on the particle diameter and flow-past velocity ( ), on the square of the particle diameter
and the particle rotation angular velocity ( ), and on the particle diameter and the gradient of the carrier
gas local velocity. Particle rotation and the Magnus force are caused by inelastic collisions of particles
with restricting surfaces (walls). Comparative calculations on Magnus force determination by the relationships
under analysis give contradictory results at comparable values of the determining criteria, thus calling
for a thorough analysis of the validity of their use in specific conditions. The Saffman force reaches
its maximum in gas flow regions with a high velocity gradient (in the vicinity of a restricting surface).
The calculations by the relationships for Saffman force determination showed a far narrower spread
in comparison with the case of the Magnus force. A specific numerical example with particles of different
diameters is considered to show the ranges of variation of the determining Reynolds criteria in the process
of motion of a particle in a turbulent carrying gas flow in a two-dimensional channel. The results obtained
may be used in numerical simulation of gas-dispersed flows in channels and in the vicinity of restricting surfaces.
rotation, velocity gradient, Reynolds criteria, carrying gas, analytical relationships, Magnus force, Saffman force, particle
1. Shraiber A. A., Milyutin V. N., Yatsenko V. P. Hydromechanics of Two-Component Flows with a Solid Polydisperse Substance. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka, 1980. 252 pp. (in Russian).
2. Sommerfeld Ì. Analysis of collision effects for turbulent gas-particle flow in a horizontal channel: Part I. Particle transport. International Journal of Multiphase Flow. 2003. No. 29. Ðp. 675-699.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9322(03)00031-4
3. Sommerfeld M, Lain S. Analysis of dilete phase pneumatic conveying through pipe systems by the Euler/Lagrange approach. Ninth International Conference on CFD in the Minerals and Process Industries CSIRO, Melbourne, Australia, December 10-12, 2012. Pp. 1-12.
4. Lain S. Study of turbulent two-phase gas-solid flow in horizontal channels. Indian Journal of Chemical Technology. 2013. V. 20. Pp. 128-136.
5. Souza F. J, Silva L., Utzig J. Gas-particle flow in a diffuser. 22nd International Congress of Mechanical Engineering, November 3-7, 2013, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil. Pp. 2970-2982.
6. Gorbis Z. R. Heat Exchange and Hydromechanics of Dispersed Through Flows. Moscow: Energiya, 1970. 424 pp. (in Russian).
7. Naumov V. A. Dynamics of the disperse particle in the viscous environment. Matem. Mod. 2006. V. 18. No. 5. Pp. 27-36. (in Russian).
8. Rubinov S. L., Keller J. B. The transverse force on a spnning sphere moving in a viscous fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 1961. V. 11, No. 3. Pp. 447-459.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112061000640
9. Nigmatullin R. I. Basics of Heterogeneous Media Mechanics. Moscow: Nauka, 1978. 336 pp. (in Russian).
10. Varaksin A. Yu. Turbulent Flows of a Gas with Solid Particles. Moscow: Fizmatlit, 2003. 192 pp. (in Russian).
11. Yatsenko V. P., Aleksandrov V. V. Magnus force measurement at moderate Reynolds numbers. Prykladna Mekhanika. 2001. V. 3 (75). No. 3. Pp. 83-87. (in Russian).
12. Kharlamov A., Chara Z., Vlasak P. Investigation of Magnus force acting on smooth sphere at high Reynolds numbers. Colloquium Fluid Dynamics 2008. Institute of Thermomechanics AS CR v.v.i., Prague, Oñtober 22 -24. 2008. Pp. 1-11.
13. Saffman P. G. The lift on a small sphere in a slow shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 1965. V. 22. No. 2. Pp. 385-400.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112065000824
14. Asmolov E. S. Transversal Migration of Spherical Particles in Shear Unstready Flows. D. Sc. thesis. Moscow, 2015. 189 pp. (in Russian).
15. Yatsenko V. P. Determination of the force acting on a spherical solid particle in a shear flow. Physics of Aerodisperse Systems (collected papers). 2002. Iss. 39. Odessa: Astroprint. Pp. 240-247. (in Russian).
16. Dandy D. S. A sphere in shear flow at finite Reynolds number: effect of shear on particle lift, drag and heat transfer. J. Fluid Mech. 1990. V. 216. Pp. 381-410.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112090000477
17. McLaughlin J. B. Inertial migration of a small sphere in linear shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 1991. V. 224. Pp. 261-274.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112091001751
18. Sow S. Hydrodynamics of Multiphase Systems. Moscow: Mir, 1971. 536 pp. (in Russian).
19. Timoshenko V. I., Knyshenko Yu. V., Shcherbakov V. I. Special features of effects of sizes of gas-dispersive flow particles on their interactions with channel walls. Teh. Meh. 2016. No. 3. Pp. 24-34. (in Russian).
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15407/itm2019.02.060
Copyright (©) 2019 Knyshenko Yu. V., Shcherbakov V. I.
Copyright © 2014-2019 Technical mechanics
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
|
GUIDE FOR AUTHORS
====================
Open Access Policy
====================
REGULATIONS
on the ethics of publications
====================
|