|
Home
>
Journal Issues
>
No 2 (2023) Technical mechanics
>
3
___________________________________________________
UDC 629.7+531.3+532.6
Technical mechanics, 2023, 2, 21 - 31
SYSTEM APPROACH TO THE ORGANIZATION OF INFORMATION SUPPORT FOR A LAUNCH VEHICLE’S ACTIVE CONTROL SYSTEM DRIVEN BY THE CURRENT OPERATING CONDITIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15407/itm2023.02.021
Gorbuntsov V. V., Zavoloka O. M.
Gorbuntsov V. V.
Institute of Technical Mechanics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine and the State Space Agency of Ukraine
Zavoloka O. M.
Institute of Technical Mechanics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine and the State Space Agency of Ukraine
The goal of this paper is to develop elements of a simulation algorithm for determining the controlled
dynamic parameters of the sustainer stages of launch vehicles (LVs) equipped with an active control
system (ACS). In this study, methods of system analysis and computational rocket dynamics were used.
The paper proposes a system approach to the organization of LV ACS information support with account
for specified limiting values of the controlled dynamic parameters: the pitch rate, the velocity
pressure, and the angle of attack. In flight, the LV ACS uses information on these parameters to
suppress bending deformations of the LV structure and form a trajectory close to the energy-optimal
one. The controlled dynamic parameters were brought to a simplified form, thus making it possible to
take the data needed for their calculation from the inertial sensors of the LV control system.
Simulation algorithm elements were developed to determine the dynamic parameters from the actual
values of the center of mass motion parameters in the launch coordinate system, which can be obtained
from their calculated values and the corresponding isochronous variations of their apparent values in
the inertial coordinate system. The elements of the simulation algorithm for the determination of the
LV sustainer stage dynamic parameters may be used in the development of ACS methodological support.
The main advantage of the proposed system approach with account for specified limiting values of the
controlled dynamic parameters is that it does not require any detailed simulation of dynamic loads
on the LV sustainer stages and uses nothing but information on the dynamic parameters that
characterize LV trajectory motion conditions.
apparent motion parameter, condition monitoring, dynamic parameter, launch vehicle, active
control system, system approach, current operating conditions, terminal control
1. Karmishin A, V., Likhoed A. I., Panichkin N. G., Sukhinin S. N. Fundamentals of Rocket Strength Design. Moscow: Mashinostroyeniye, 2007. 480 pp. (in Russian).
2. Titov V. A. Features of rocket structure loading analysis from processed telemetric data. Trudy MAI. 2017. Iss. 93. Pp. 1 - 25 (in Russian).
3. Aizenberg Ya. E., Sukhorebry V. G. Design of Launch Vehicle Stabilization Systems. Moscow: Mashinostroyeniye, 1986. 220 pp. (in Russian).
4. Petrov B. N., Portnov-Sokolov Yu. P., Andrienko A. Ya., Ivanov V. P. Issues of the Theory and Practice of Onboard Terminal Control System Development. Moscow: Mashinostroyeniye, 1983. 200 pp. (in Russian).
5 Andrienko A. Ya., Ivanov V. P. Issues of the theory and practice of the development of liquid-propellant launch vehicle terminal systems. Avtomatika i Telemekhanika. 2013. No. 3. Pp. 401 - 412. (in Russian).
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0005117913030065
6. Kalev V. I., Shorikov A. F. Solution to the problem of optimal program terminal control of launch vehicle propellant consumption. Izvestiya RAN. Teoriya i Sistemy Upravleniya. 2019. No. 1. Pp. 166 - 176. (in Russian).
7. Howe D. Aircraft Loading and Structural Layout. London: Professional Engineering Publishing Limited, 2004. 592 pp.
https://doi.org/10.2514/4.477041
8. Korolev S. P. Fundamentals of long-range ballistic missile design. Acad. S. P. Korolev's Creative Heritage. Selected Works and Documents. Acad. M. V. Keldysh (Ed.). Moscow: Nauka, 1980. Pp. 208 - 290. (in Russian).
9. Zolkin S. N. Study of heavy launch vehicle loading in the dense atmosphere. Trudy MAI. 2011. Iss. 45. http://www.mai.ru/science/trudy/. (in Russian).
10. Dittrich J. Design and Construction. System Approach. Moscow: Mir, 1981. 454 pp. (in Russian).
11. Wang R., Dagli C. H. Developing a holistic modeling approach for search-based system architecting. Conference on Systems Engineering Research (CSER'13). Eds.: C. J. J. Paredis, C. Bishop, D. Bodner, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, March 19-22, 2013. Procedia Computer Science. 2013. V. 16. Pp. 206 - 215.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.01.022
12. Tikhomirova O. G., Galitsky S. V. Design of production systems based on a holistic system approach. Fundamentalnye Issledovaniya. 2018. No. 4. Pp. 120 - 124. (in Russian).
13. ISO-13374-1. Condition Monitoring and Diagnostics of Machines. Condition monitoring and diagnostics of machines - Data processing, communication and presentation - Part 1: General guidelines. Technical Committee 108/Subcommittee 5, March 15, 2003. 5 pp.
14. NASA Technical Standard. NASA-STD-5002A. Load Analyses of Spacecraft and Payloads. Approved: 2019-09-25 superseding NASA-STD-5002. 44 pp.
15. Space engineering. Structural general requirements. ECSS-E-ST-32C. Rev. 1. 15 November 2008. ESA Requirements and Standards Division, 2008. 134 pp.
16. Space Engineering. Spacecraft Mechanical Loads Analysis Handbook. ECSS-E-HB-32-26. Approved: 19 February 2013. Noordwijk : ECA Requirements & Standards Division, 2013. 505 pp.
17. Russian State Standard GOST R ISO 13372 2013. Condition Monitoring and Diagnostics of Machines. Terms and Definitions. Approved on September 1, 2014. Moscow: Standartinform, 2014. 15 pp. (in Russian).
18. Zavoloka A. N. Problems and new tasks in the improvement of launch vehicle energy efficiency. Teh. Meh. 2008. No. 2. Pp. 34 - 42. (in Russian).
19. Gorbuntsov V. V., Zavoloka A. N., Sviridenko N. F. Active flight control for launch vehicle: a new approach and rational ways for its realization. Teh. Meh. 2016. No. 2. Pp. 32 - 43. (in Russian).
20. Gorbuntsov V. V., Zavoloka A. N., Sviridenko N. F. Increase in target-oriented efficiency of space medium-sized rocket: advanced lines for updating. Teh. Meh. 2016. No. 4. Pp. 50 - 61. (in Russian).
21. Ryzhov V. P. System engineering aspects of signal choice in information system design. Radiotekhnika. 2011. No. 9. Pp. 108 - 112. (in Russian).
22. Glumov V. M., Zemlyakov S. D., Puchkov A. M., Rutkovsky V. Yu. Controlling the angular position of a stationary spacecraft with a variable efficiency of control moments. Izvestiya Akademii Nauk. Teoriya i Sistemy Upravleniya. 2000. No. 1. Pp. 120 - 134. (in Russian)
23. Puchkov A. M., Syrov A. S. Principle of spacecraft turn control at a large parameter spread. Aviakosmicheskaya Tekhnika i Tekhnologiya.1999. No. 2. Pp. 35 - 39. (in Russian).
24. Upper-Stage Rocket Control System. A. S. Syrov (Ed.). Moscow: MAI-PRINT, 2010. 272 pp. (in Russian).
25. Russian State Standard GOST 4401-81. Standard Atmosphere. Parameters. Approved on February 27, 1981. Moscow: USSR's State Committee on Standards, 2004 (redraft). 180 pp. (in Russian).
26. Fedos'ev V. I. Fundamentals of Rocket Flight Technique. Moscow: Nauka, 1981. 495 pp. (in Russian).
27. Lebedev A. A., Gerasyuta N. F. Rocket Ballistics. Moscow: Mashinostroyeniye, 1970. 244 pp. (in Russian).
Copyright (©) 2023 Gorbuntsov V. V., Zavoloka O. M.
Copyright © 2014-2023 Technical mechanics
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
|
GUIDE FOR AUTHORS
====================
Open Access Policy
====================
REGULATIONS
on the ethics of publications
====================
|